The 2026 U.S. threat assessment highlights lone wolf extremists as the primary terrorism risk, with online radicalization ...
Ga., when she said it is the president’s responsibility — and not that of the intelligence community — to determine imminent threats against the U.S. Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the intelligence ...
Top Trump administration officials testified publicly Wednesday for the first time since the launch of the Iran war three ...
On Wednesday, the director of national intelligence and C.I.A. director contradicted one of the justifications the Trump ...
Democratic senators pressed the U.S. government’s top intelligence official at annual worldwide threats hearings Wednesday about the war with Iran, including whether she had advised President Donald ...
The hearing offers the public a glimpse into the largely secret operations of the government's intelligence agencies and the threats they confront. They take place at a time of scrutiny over the war w ...
The nation's top intelligence official, Tulsi Gabbard, said today that Iran's government still seems to be functioning, though it has been greatly weakened by the U.S. and Israeli bombing campaign.
And Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, says only Trump himself can judge whether that claim is true. In the years before America turned authoritarian, Gabbard didn’t talk this way.
How is a US president supposed to determine what is an imminent threat from foreign actors without an intelligence assessment?